you must follow all the instruction listed bellow and for more information, refer to the attachment.
Your answer must do the following:
Use a formal academic essay format, including an introduction with thesis statement, supporting body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Incorporate explicitly two of the following Political Science concepts: o separation of powers o checks and balances o 10th Amendment reserved powers o the states’ police powers o the commerce clause o types of federalism – such as dual, cooperative, or competitive o the role of the courts o Gonzales v. Raich (2005) o public opinion o methods of constitutional interpretation o political polarization o political parties o media framing o civil liberties o civil rights
You must include at least two explicit and relevant references to the OpenStax textbook.
Cite sources using parenthetical citation and a works cited list. Either MLA or APA are acceptable formats.
You will need to conduct some additional background research. Here are a few recommended articles to get you started: o Friedersdorf, Conor. “The Superiority of a States’ Rights Approach to Marijuana.” The Atlantic. 4 January 2018. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/01/the-superior-morality-of-astates-rights-approach-to-marijuana/549707/. o Ponnuru, Ramesh. “On Marijuana Law, No Politician Is a True Federalist.” Bloomberg 4 January 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-01-04/on-marijuana-law-no-politician-is-atrue-federalist. o Cooke, Charles C.W. “Marijuana is a Gateway Drug to Federalism.” The National Review 4 January 2018. https://www.nationalreview.com/blog/corner/marijua… o Adler, Jonathan H. “Will marijuana make federalism go up in smoke?” The Washington Post. 14 August 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspir… o Sessions, Jefferson B. “Memorandum for All United States Attorneys.” Office of the Attorney General, United States, 4 January 2018, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pressrelease/file/1022… o Majority, Concurring, and Dissenting Opinions in Gonzales v. Raich (2005): https://www.oyez.org/cases/2004/03-1454
WhatsApp us