In this assignment, you will explore how interrogation is different from interviewing.
Scenario:
You work as a psychology professional for a metropolitan police department. Your primary job is to screen police officers for employment and emotional stability. You make recommendations about their suitability for employment, conduct interviews with police officers to determine whether they should be referred for counseling, and monitor their performance by dialogues with their superiors. You are recognized for your skills as a clinician, and you are asked to participate with a team of interrogators so they may become more proficient in obtaining confessions from suspects.
Compare the relationship of a psychology professional working with a suspect as a client with the relationship of a psychology professional working as a consultant to an interrogator.
Tasks:
In a minimum of 300 words, respond to the following:
Use the current version of the APA ethics code; choose elements of the ethical principles to explore issues, such as “do not harm,” “informed consent,” “use of assessment techniques by unqualified persons,” and “resolving ethics code conflicts in an organization.” Explore the following issues in the context of the scenario above:
Submission Details:
Grading Criteria | Maximum Points |
Quality of initial posting, including fulfillment of assignment instructions |
16 |
Quality of responses to classmates |
12 |
Frequency of responses to classmates |
4 |
Reference to supporting readings and other materials |
4 |
Language and grammar |
4 |
Total: |
40 |
Rubrics
WhatsApp us