Is Kissing a “State Sponsor of Terrorism” a “Terrorist Act”? | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

http://www.globalresearch.ca/is-kissing-a-state-sponsor-of-terrorism-a-terrorist-act/5332856[6/24/2015 3:53:14 PM]

About Contact Membership Store Donate USA Canada Latin America Africa Middle East Europe Russia & FSU Asia Oceania

Español Italiano Deutsch Português srpski Notre site en Français: mondialisation.ca

Asia-Pacific Research

US-NATO War Economy Civil Rights Environment Poverty Media Justice 9/11 War Crimes Militarization History Science

Global Research Newsletter

Latest News / Top Stories

The Next Phase of the Middle East War. Pentagon “Guidelines” for “Preemptive” Nuclear Strikes against “Rogue Enemies”

Vladimir Putin on the Global Economy, Geopolitics and Russia-Europe Relations

Big Pharma: How They Manipulate American Medical Doctors

The Delphi Declaration on the European Russian Crisis

Today I Saw a Weeping Palestinian Man Holding a Plastic Bag of Meat: It Was His Son

Propaganda Reigns In The West

NATO-Russia Collision Ahead?

British Actors, Film Directors and Writers Demand Immediate Sanctions against

All Articles

Is Kissing a “State Sponsor of Terrorism” a “Terrorist Act”? Political satire. George W. Bush and the Late King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia

In the immediate wake of the 9/11 attacks, George W. Bush stated in no uncertain terms that “State sponsors of terrorism” would be considered as “terrorists”.

“We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them”.

But there is always an “Exception that the Proves the Rule” and that is George W. Bush himself.

When George W. Bush respectfully kisses King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, does this mean that Dubya could –by some stretch of the imagination– be considered a “suspected terrorist”, who should never have been elected president of the United States of America?

The answer is negative: Kissing “State sponsors of terrorism” on the mouth is not defined by the FBI as “suspicious behavior”.

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, February 28, 2015 Global Research 25 April 2013

Theme: 9/11 & ‘War on Terrorism’

Is Kissing a “State Sponsor of Terrorism” a “Terrorist Act”? | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

http://www.globalresearch.ca/is-kissing-a-state-sponsor-of-terrorism-a-terrorist-act/5332856[6/24/2015 3:53:14 PM]

Truth in Media: Support the Global Research News Hour

Become a Member of Global Research – Receive Free Books!

“Artworks for Peace”: Support Global Research

Donate to Global Research

NEWS

MOST POPULAR

GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS

THEMES

I-BOOKS SERIES

IN-DEPTH REPORTS

GLOBAL RESEARCH VIDEOS

THE GLOBAL RESEARCH NEWS HOUR

The Global War on Terrorism’s “New Normal“: “Good Guy” Terrorists

Establishing political ties with “State sponsors of terrorism” is now considered to be part of a “New Normal”, a humanitarian endeavor intent upon spreading American democracy Worldwide.

NATO calls it “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P).

John Kerry concurs: financial aid to Syria’s Al Nusra, an affiliate of Al Qaeda is part of an R2P mandate.

There are now “‘good guy terrorists” and “bad guy terrorists”.

Financial aid is channeled to Al Qaeda “good guy terrorists” to protect Syrians against the terrorists (New York Times, April 20, 2013)

Al Nusra “Good Guy Terrorists” supported by John Kerry

The Bush and bin Laden Families

Now let us turn our attention to the Bin Laden Family.

The Bushes and bin Ladens are long-time friends.

Is Kissing a “State Sponsor of Terrorism” a “Terrorist Act”? | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

http://www.globalresearch.ca/is-kissing-a-state-sponsor-of-terrorism-a-terrorist-act/5332856[6/24/2015 3:53:14 PM]

Advanced Search

Index by Countries

Index by Author

Global Research Publishers

Join us on Facebook

Partner Websites

Project Censored

Stop NATO

Strategic Culture Foundation

The Corbett Report

Washington’s Blog

We know that the late Osama bin Laden was a “bad guy”: “Enemy Number One”.

He is a disgrace to members of the bin Laden family, who reluctantly provided him with “pocket money”, which was used to develop Al Qaeda (The Base). He is referred to as a “Black Sheep”.

There is nothing wrong, therefore, in socializing and doing business with family members of terror mastermind Osama bin Laden, including the late Salem bin Laden and Shafiq bin Laden of the Carlyle Group.

Its all part of a “good guys project” of going after Osama, the “Black Sheep”, and waging the “Global War on Terrorism”.

Confirmed by the Washington Post, “fellow investors” of the Carlyle Group Osama’s brother Shafiq bin Laden and former President H.G.W. Bush met at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel one day before 9/11 (see image below):

It didn’t help that as the World Trade Center burned on Sept. 11, 2001, the news interrupted a Carlyle business conference at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel here attended by a brother of Osama bin Laden [Shafiq bin Laden]. Former president Bush [senior, seem image above], a fellow investor, had been with him at the conference the previous day. (Greg Schneider, Pairing the Powerful With the Rich, Washington Post, March 16, 2003)

Shafiq bin Laden, Osama’s brother and member of the Carlyle Group meets George H. W. Bush

at Ritz Carlton on September 10, 2001 (Source: Michael Moore, Fahrenheit 911)

Launched on September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush is the political architect of the “Global War on Terrorism” commonly referred to as GWOT.

On the evening of September 11, 2001, president George W. Bush pronounced a historic speech in which he defined the relationship between “terrorists’ and “state sponsors of terrorism”:

The search is underway for those who are behind these evil acts. I’ve directed the full resources of our intelligence and law enforcement communities to find those responsible and to bring them to justice. We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.

In a subsequent address to the joint session of the House of Representatives and the Senate on September 20, 2001:

“We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or no rest. And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. (Applause.) From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime [state sponsor of terrorism].

“Every nation in every region now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” – President George W. Bush, 20 September 2001

Now let us pause and reflect