Required Resources
Werner, J., & DeSimone, R. (2017). Human Resource Development: Talent Development (7th ed.).Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Supplemental Resource
Hesselbein, F., & Goldsmith, M. (2009).The organization of the future: Vision, strategies, and
insights on managing in the new era. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Losey, M., Meisinger, S., & Ulrich, D. (2005). The future of human resource management.
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
The Society of Human Resources Management. (2012). General format. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org. (Join SHRM as a student member, located at
http://www.shrm.org/Communities/StudentPrograms/Pages/memberinfo.aspx
Zeidner, R. (2009). Does the United States need foreign workers? HRMagazine, 54(6), 42-47.
Assignment 3: New Student (or Employee) Orientation Program
Worth 200 points
Acting as the human resource director for your university or workplace, design a new student or employee orientation program to offer information and socialization opportunities for incoming students or staff. Your design should be based on a blended learning approach and address the following elements.
Write a ten (10) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 200 |
Assignment 3: New Student (or Employee) Orientation Program |
|||
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Determine at least three (3) objectives for the orientation program. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely discussed three (3) objectives with measurable criteria of the orientation program. |
Partially discussed three (3) objectives with measurable criteria of the orientation program. |
Satisfactorily discussed three (3) objectives with measurable criteria of the orientation program. |
Thoroughly discussed three (3) objectives with measurable criteria of the orientation program. |
2. Outline the critical elements of the program |
Did not submit or incompletely outlined the critical elements for the program. |
Partially outlined the critical elements for the program. |
Satisfactorily outlined the critical elements for the program. |
Thoroughly outlined the critical elements for the program. |
3. Identify the knowledge, skills, and abilities you would like the participant to possess upon completion of the orientation process. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or did not identify the knowledge, skills, and abilities you would like the participant to possess upon completion of the orientation process or incompletely discussed them. |
Partially identified and / or discussed the knowledge, skills, and abilities you would like the participant to possess upon completion of the orientation process. |
Satisfactorily identified and / or discussed the knowledge, skills, and abilities you would like the participant to possess upon completion of the process. |
Thoroughly identified and / or discussed the knowledge, skills, and abilities you would like the participant to possess upon completion of the process. |
4. Discuss the blend of training delivery methods you selected and support your blend. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely discussed the blend of training delivery methods selected and did not submit or incompletely supported your blend. |
Partially discussed the blend of training delivery methods selected and partially supported your blend. |
Satisfactorily discussed the blend of training delivery methods selected and satisfactorily supported your blend. |
Thoroughly discussed the blend of training delivery methods selected and thoroughly supported your blend. |
5. Discuss the evaluation process you will use to assess the success of the orientation program. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely discussed the evaluation process you used to assess the success of the orientation program. |
Partially discussed the evaluation process you used to assess the success of the orientation program. |
Satisfactorily discussed the evaluation process you used to assess the success of the orientation program. |
Thoroughly discussed the evaluation process you used to assess the success of the orientation program. |
6. 6 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
WhatsApp us