In our second essay, we will explore the effects of technology on human behavior. Begin by

reading the articles on pages 194-207 in our textbook, （Sourcework Academic Writing from Sources Second edition by Nancy E.Dollahite Julie Haun Then, collect information and

evidence that shows the various effects of technology on human behavior. Once you have

enough information, pick a side of this argument: Does technology, overall, have a positive or

negative effect on human behavior? You do not need to include a counterargument paragraph;

however, it is optional. Be sure to use evidence in your responses to support your arguments, and

follow all MLA format guidelines, including a Works Cited page. Essay length should be at least

2.5 pages long. Remember to use only the articles in this section of our textbook. Do not use any

other sources

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Didn’t give a page requirement but it said to make sure everything in the Rubric is included. I have attached all details and the rubric.

Imagine it is your job to write a leader guidebook for new supervisors in your current organization or an organization with which you are familiar, based on the new science realities. Your guide should include the following:

• Descriptions of effective best practices and day-to-day behaviors that leaders should follow for planning, measuring, motivating people, managing change and information, designing jobs, and encouraging relationships.
• Descriptions of ineffective practices that leaders should avoid in order to be successful.
• Explanation of the importance and implications of these new science guidelines to the success of the enterprise.
• Examples and explanations for the positions you take.

Additional Requirements

• Length: Your leader guidebook should be double-spaced and long enough to meet the expectations of the assessment and scoring guide criteria.
• Font and size: Use a standard font—either Times New Roman or Arial. The font size must be 12 point.
• Margins: The paper margins should be 1 inch on each side.
• Components: Include a title page, table of contents, and reference page.
• Formatting: APA format is required for all aspects of your guidebook, including citations and references. Your writing should be well organized and clear. Writing structure, spelling, and grammar should be correct as well.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

1. Identify any areas of strength and weakness based on results after examinations. To overcome the areas of weakness, devise a three-step plan for corrective action and share with your classmates.

Your post should be a minimum 500 words .

2. Meetings could be a fun or most-hated. The elements of planning, hosting and ensuring a meeting fulfill its overall purpose in a major task. In 250 words, share your thoughts on the following items:

1. Ensuring a meeting whether virtual, in-person or phone is successful

2. Handling many personalities and characteristics among the attendees (i.e. those that are quiet, those that are talkative, those that are argumentative, those that are routinely late to meetings and those that attempt to hijack the meeting by taking control)

3. How do you get everyone involved, engaged and participative?

4. The importance of delegation of tasks and follow up to ensure delegated tasks are completed.

5. Frequency of meetings without going overboard.

Your initial post comprising a minimum 250 words should have 2-3 credible sources /peer-reviewed references using APA format

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Prompt: A rhetorical analysis evaluates how an author (or artist) attempts to reach, maybe even influence, an audience. Locate a visual/oral/verbal text about borders that you deem interesting (and potentially persuasive) and analyze it according to the way the text uses rhetorical effects and strategies to make its argument. Use specific textual evidence to establish a general argument (i.e., thesis) about how the text “works.” You should not simply paraphrase or summarize what the rhetor says or composes; rather, your goal is to provide a way of understanding the measure of persuasive effect by analyzing the rhetorical situation.

To do this, first identify the rhetor, intended audience, message, and intended purpose of the text. This information will set the foundation for the rest of your analysis. Next, explain how(and how effectively) the text

• appeals to its intended audience;
• employs the available means (the rhetorical appeals of ethos, logos, pathos; the rhetorical methods of development; and visual and/or aural elements, if applicable);
• uses good reasons (that are ethical, practical, and aesthetic); and
• anticipates or acknowledges counterarguments in the service of reaching its intended audience.

You should go beyond description of the rhetorical elements of the text to look at howthose elements work to achieve the text’s purpose. Your ideas should be developed through textual evidence and analysis of that evidence. Finally, evaluate the measure of persuasive effect—decide whether or not the text constitutes a fitting response (of informing, explaining, motivating, identifying, etc.). Make an argument regarding the aspect of the text’s rhetoric that is most interesting, revealing, and/or important.

Process: As a first step, propose a text for analysis by October 15, explaining what makes this text an interesting subject (i.e., what is not rhetorically obvious) for rhetorical analysis.

As you are drafting, consider how you are supporting your claims about the text. Refer to specific moments in the text (using quotes and other concrete details) as evidence for your explanation of how the rhetor uses rhetorical strategies. At the same time, consider the balance between description and analysis in your writing. Describe moments in the text in order to make your argument, but remember that your job is not to summarize the text for your readers. Your job is to evaluate the text by analyzing these details and making an argument about their rhetorical effect. After drafting, revise and edit. Consider carefully the organization and coherence of your piece. Develop clear paragraphs that support your thesis organized around a definite topic. Rough drafts are due for peer review on October 18, final drafts are due October 25.

Format: Your final draft should be 3-4 pages (double-spaced, TNR font, 1” margins). When citing your outside source(s), follow MLA format.

Grading Criteria: Your essay should

1. make a claim (a thesis) about an interesting, potentially persuasive text;
2. identify the rhetor, intended audience, message, and intended purpose of the text;
3. assess the text’s employment of available means, good reasons, and counterarguments;
4. evaluate the text as a fitting response through sufficient textual evidence and analysis; and
5. craft sophisticated, purposeful, and clear paragraphs and sentences.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

In a 2 to 3 page, double-spaced essay (12pt font), write a personal and reflective essay and write it as an example of your best writing. Grammar, spelling, format, will all count. You must use at least one short quote from the reading “How to be True to Your Word” but no more than three short quotes and all quotes must be placed in quotation marks and followed immediately by proper APA citation information in parentheses. No other written sources for this essay should be quoted, copied, or summarized. No more than 40 words are allowed in any one quote. The full source information of the quote must also be listed at the end of the essay under work cited.

After reading the article “How to be True to Your Word”, write about the following: Based on your experience with someone in your life who was not true to their word, tell the story of what happened and how it affected the relationship (you may use a false name for the person). Explain what one thing makes untruthfulness so very wrong in your view. Is your explanation of what’s wrong with a broken promise a consequentialist or a non-consequentialist type of reasoning? Explain. At what point does Cat Thompson use consequentialist or non-consequentialist reasoning about what’s wrong with untruthfulness in the article on “How to be True to Your Word” (LINK (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.)? Identify and explain the use as one or the other type of reasoning. Support your answers from the article.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.